Respon Pertumbuhan Spesies C3 dan C4 terhadap Cekaman Kekeringan dan Konsentrasi CO2 tinggi

Hamim Hamim

doi:10.20884/1.mib.2005.22.3.174

Respon Pertumbuhan Spesies C3 dan C4 terhadap Cekaman Kekeringan dan Konsentrasi CO2 tinggi

Hamim Hamim⁽¹⁾

⁽¹⁾

DOI: 10.20884/1.mib.2005.22.3.174

Abstrak

Growth response of two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 species (Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatus) were analyzed in response to drought stress under different CO₂ concentrations, i.e. ambient (350 ppm) and double ambient (700 ppm). Drought was given by withholding water for several days until the plants were wilted. Drought stress reduced relative water content (RWC), water potential (Y_w), osmotic potential (Y_s), net photosynthesis (Pn) and plant growth of all species. During moderate drought Pn of C3 species decreased considerably, while that of C4 species was still sustained, suggesting that C4 cycle is important to sustain Pn during the beginning of the drought. Doubled [CO₂] enhanced growth of all species indicated by increase of plant height and leaf area, but the growth of C3 species was higher than that of C4 one. Increase of growth due to high [CO₂] was associated with an increase of Pn in C3 species but not in C4 species. High [CO₂] caused C4 species had RWC, Y_wand Y_s higher than C3 species during drought stress. Increase of growth in C4 species may be associated by an increase of plant water status due to high [CO₂].

Kata Kunci

drought, high CO2, C3 and C4 crops, growth

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Baker, J.T., L.H. Allen, K.J. Boote, and N.B. Pickering. 1997. Rice responses to drought under CO2 enrichment: 2. Photosynthesis and evapotranspiration. Agric Forest Meteorol. 83: 37-48.

Boyer, J.S. 1985. Water transport. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36:473-516.

Drake, B.G., M.A. Gonzalez-Meler, and S.P. Long. 1997. More efficient plants: A consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48:609-639.

Frederick, J.R., D.M. Alm, J.D Hesketh, and F.E.Below. 1990. Overcoming drought-induced decreases in soybean leaf photosynthesis by measuring with CO2-enriched air. Photosyn. Res. 25:49-57.

Ghannoum, O., S. van Caemmerer. E.W.R, Barlow, and J.P. Conroy. 1997. The effect of CO2 enrichment and irradiance on the growth, morphology and gas exchange of a C3 (Panicum laxum) and a C4 (Panicum antidotale) grass. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24:227-237.

Ghannoum, O., S. von Caemmerer, L.H. Ziska, and J.P. Conroy. 2000. The growth response of C4 plants to rising atmospheric CO2 partial pressure: a reassessment. Plant, Cell Environ. 23:931-942.

Hamim, 2003. Will the Increasing Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Change the Effect of Drought on C3 and C4 Species?. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Essex. Colchester. United Kingdom.

Hamim, 2004. Underlaying drought stress effects on plant: Inhibition of photosynthesis. Hayati. 11:164-169.

Hamim, H and J.I.L. Morison. 2002. Does osmotic adjustment increase in high CO2 and affect the response of leaf photosynthesis to drought. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 132/A: S156-S157.

Heath, J. and G. Kerstiens. 1997. Effect of elevated CO2 on leaf gas exchange in beech and oak at two levels of nutrient supply: consequences for sensitivity to drought in beech. Plant, Cell Environ. 20:57-67.

IPCC, 2001. Summary for policymakers. Pp:1-20. In: Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Mashell and C.A. Johnson (Eds.). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basic. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Johnson, J.D., R. Tognetti, and P. Paris. 2002. Water relation and gas exchange in poplar and willow under water stress and elevated CO2. Physiol. Plant. 115:93-100.

Joos, F., A. Ramirez-Rojas, J.M.R.Stone, and J. Zillman. 2001. Technical summary of the working group I report. Pp. 21-83. In: Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Mashell and C.A. Johnson (Eds.). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basic. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Kanai, R. and G.E, Edwards. 1999. The biochemistry of C4 photosynthesis. Pp. 49-87. In: Sage, R.F. and R.K. Monson. C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press. San Diego, London, Boston, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.

Kramer, P.J. and J.S Boyer. 1995. Water Relations of Plants and Soils. London: Academic Press.

Lawlor, D.W. 1995. The effects of water deficit on photosynthesis. Pp.129-160. In. N. Smirnoff (Ed). Environment and Plant Metabolism, Flexibility and Acclimation. Bios Scientific Publishers. Oxford.

Long, S.P. 1999. Environmental responses. Pp.215-249. In: Sage, R.F. and R.K. Monson. C4 Plant Biology. Academic Press. San Diego, London, Boston, New York, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto.

Manabe, S. and R.T. Watherald. 1987. Large-scale changes of soil wetness induced by an increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Atmos. Sci. 44:1211-1235.

Mishra, R.S., M.Z Abdin, and D.C Uprety. 1999. Interactive effects of elevated CO2 and moisture stress on the photosynthesis, water relation and growth of Brassica species. Agron. Crop Sci. 182:223-229.

Morison, J.I.L 1985. Sensitivity of stomata and water use efficiency to high CO2. Plant, Cell Environ. 8:467-474.

Morison, J.I.L. and D.W. Lawlor. 1999. Interaction between increasing CO2 concentration and temperature on plant growth. Plant, Cell Environ. 22:659-682.

Niyogi, K.K. 1999. Photoprotection revisited: Genetic and molecular approaches. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol.Plant Mol.Biol. 50.333-359.

Palanisamy, K. 1999. Interactions of elevated CO2 concentration and drought stress on photosynthesis in Eucalyptus cladocalyx F-Muell. Photosynthetica. 36:635-638.

Pitelka, L and A. Ramirez-Rojas. 2001. The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. Pp. 184-237. In: Houghton, J.T., Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Mashell and C.A. Johnson (Eds.). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basic. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Pospisilova, J. and J. Catsky 1999. Development of Water Stress under Increased Atmospheric CO2 Concentration. Biol. Plant. 42 (1):1-24.

Seneweera, S.P., O. Ghannoum, and J Conroy. 1998. High vapour pressure deficit and low soil water availability enhance shoot growth responses of a C4 grass (Panicum coloratum cv. Bambatsi) to CO2 enrichment. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 25:287-292.

Sims, D., W. Cheng, Y. Lu,. and J. Seemann. 1999. Photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2 in a sunflower canopy. J. Exp. Bot. 50:645-653.

Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2002. Plant Physiology (3rd Edition). Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers. 690p.

von Caemmerer, S., M. Ludwig, A .Milgate, G.D. Farquhar, D. Price, M.R. Badger, and R.T. Furbang. 1997. Carbon isotope discrimination during C4 photosynthesis: insights from transgenic plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 24:487-493.

Ward, J.K., D.T Tissue, R.B. Thomas, and B.R Strain. 1999. Comparative responses of model C3 and C4 plants to drought in low and elevated CO2. Glob. Change Biol. 5:857-867.

Wullschleger., S.D., T.J. Tschaplinski, and R.J Norby. 2002. Plant water relation at elevated CO2 – implications for water-limited environments. Plant, Cell Environ. 25:319-331.